The Tosser King Redux

The great wanker, he of churlish wit and girlish charm, the hairy coquette, Tyson Fury, the Tosser King defended his imaginary crown once again, this time against one Otto Wallin, who, as I’ve previously pointed out, has accumulated a record of 20-0 by fighting an assortment of corpses with a collective record of 271-259.

Otto made it semi-interesting in that he opened a cut on Fury’s noggin in round three that could have stopped the fight, but didn’t. (Maybe should have stopped the fight – one has to wonder about the legitimacy of the ref and ring doctor when Fury got rocked in round 12 and they let it go on without the doctor looking again at the eye.)

He won ten rounds to two.

What I want to see is the rematch with Wilder. This has been is set for February but now the big Tosser may have to put the kibosh on that, or at least delay it, since getting his melon sliced open by Wallin. If he misses that date with destiny, who knows where he’ll end up? A lot can happen in the next months.

Primarily the Ruiz / Joshua rematch, the fight for the real lineal championship. Pulev already has himself in position to be the mandatory challenger for the winner of that fight. What if Pulev wins that one? (I jest) How long will it take then for Fury to get himself a shot at the real title? First he has to beat Wilder, whenever that fight takes place, then he has to hope the boxing stars align to allow him a shot at Pulev, Joshua or Ruiz, as the case may be. That’s assuming that Kownacki or Joyce or Whyte or Povetkin aren’t next in line by that time.

Hell, what if Wilder loses to Ortiz? Will anyone care to watch Fury / Wilder 2 then?

At the very least, the myth of him being “the one true champion” has been exposed for what it is; a masturbatory fantasy. He should have been fighting real fighters instead of tomato cans, working his way to the place where the boxing fans and governing bodies alike would be demanding that he get a shot at the crown.

Now he’s lost a lot of momentum on that upward trek, and he’s got a rather severly damaged eye. As my mom used to say: “If you don’t stop it, you’ll go blind.”

The big Tosser.

The Terrible Tiff on the Edge of Town

Yes, that’s a landscape from the Teletubbies show.  And no, I’m not making a fat joke.  And yes, my artwork is pathetic. 

I put that picture there because it most adequately expresses my reaction to the news that Ruiz and Joshua are going to fight in Saudi Arabia.  I think it’s the first time there’s been a heavyweight title fight there. (Checks memory banks) Yep, the first time.

I’m giddy. I’m thrilled. I’m beside myself.

The exotic location makes it that much more intriguing, like an epic fight of old:

This is going to be historic, Like the Thrilla in Manilla, the Caracas Caper, the Rumble in the Jungle,  This will be legendary, epic.  All that remains is for Andy and Anthony to make a good fight of it.

 I’m so glad they didn’t muck it up by letting it go to Cardiff.

(Mostly I’m just happy to have a real fight to look forward to, after the announcement of the latest Tyson Fury wank-fest.)

So an epic battle of historical significance needs a good title, but they’ve given us “The Clash in the Dunes”?

Really?  Pee-yoo!

That’s the best we could do?  I mean these Saudi guys put up $100 million, we should do better. We owe it to them.  

So let’s put on our thinking caps.

The fight is taking place in Diriyah, a town on the outskirts of Riyadh, and which looks too much like “diarrhea” to be of any use.  So we could use Riyadh, the desert, the sand, or the sun as the location.

So, right off the top of my head, we could use “Struggle in the Sand”, or “Duel in the Desert”, or “Scuffle in the Sun” or “Ruckus in Riyadh”.  

Or, getting away from alliteration, it could be “Melee in the Desert” or “Fracas in the Sun” or, if they had all four belts on the line, the “Brawl for them All”.

Or, my favorite, (with apologies to Gabriel Iglesias) “the Fat and the Furious.”

And that took me all of three minutes. 

Hail to the Tosser King

Tyson Fury keeps calling Deontay Wilder a dosser. At first I thought he was saying tosser, but no, dosser. So I looked it up, and it means “homeless person” or “a city person who does not have a permanent home and sleeps in the streets or in very cheap hotels.” In other words, what we used to call a hobo, a bum.

And that makes sense. As long as I can remember, “bum” was an accepted boxing pejorative, along with palooka and mook.

But I like tosser. It means the same thing as wanker, one who plays with himself. And that will be Fury’s new title on this blog, the Tosser King. He wants to be recognized as the Lineal Champion, and calls himself “the Gypsy King” but for now around here it will be “Tosser King”, for him, the wanker.

“What”, you are asking, “has turned you against the big Brit?”

I wanted to be a Fury fan, really I did. After the Wilder fight I had to change my opinion of his boxing abilities. He is quick and slick and hard to hit. And I loved his demeanor after the fight. You could see that he was disappointed with the draw, but he kept smiling and being gracious. He did a similar thing after the Klitschko fight, where to settle a bet, he sang a song acapella into the mike, not afraid to make an ass of himself. He looked to be (in both cases) like a man on an adrenaline high who just loves his sport.

And he dropped all pretense of hostility toward his opponents, he hugged them, complimented them, thanked them, told them he loved them.

It kind freaked Wilder out. He went with it, but you could see him thinking “WTF?”.

And I LOVED it when he called out Joshua, flapping his arms and clucking like a chicken. That was both funny and charming.

At that time, I was a converted Fury fan, looking forward to watching him fight again.

But then, as I have theorized elsewhere, Slugworth got to him and convinced him to abandon reaching for the lofty goals of title belts, unification, etc., and sink down into the fetid swamp of maximum moolah.

So we got Fury / Schwartz. Not Fury / Ortiz or Kownacki or Rivas or Whyte. Schwartz. And we were treated the spectacle of a grown man being treated like a kitten treats a ball of yarn. It was sad. It was shameful.

And he went right back to the trash talk. I even heard him go back in time and throw shade at Klitschko, which makes no sense. The man is retired, he’s not going to come back and fight you again, let him be.

And now he’s chosen to fight Otto Wallin. Another “not-ready-for-prime-time player.”

Oy.

“Butt Otto Wallin is professional boxer, and he’s undefeated.”

Yeah, and Francesco Pianetta was a professional boxer and undefeated when Klitschko fought him, (I know, because being incredulous, I looked it up). He was 29-0 and his opponents up to that point in his career had a combined record of 448-273. He had victories over Oliver McCall and Frans Botha on his resume. Yet Klitschko made him look like some couch potato that fell asleep and just dream-wandered through the wrong door and found himself in a boxing match.

Otto Wallin is 20-0 and his opponents have a combined record of 271-259.

I expect he’ll get a rude awakening too.

As for his claim to the lineal championship:

Bitch, please.

He gave it up when he failed to show up for the rematch with Klitschko. Not getting into the ring isn’t the same as not being beaten in the ring. He gave it up, relinquished it, let it go. He refused to defend it. Sure, he had good reason, but that doesn’t change the fact that he didn’t show up. You don’t win championships on the kindness of others and you sure as hell don’t keep them that way either.

Then Joshua and Klitschko duked it out for all his hardware, and in reality the lineal championship as well. In the case of a gap in succession (like when the champ retires), the protocol is to award the title to the winner of a confrontation between the number one and number two fighters in their weight class. No, I don’t know where Klitschko and Joshua were ranked when they fought, but if they weren’t one and two I’d like to know who was.

So Joshua wins the fight, reels in all those belts and the moniker “Lineal Champ.” Subsequently he lost it to Andy Ruiz, so to my way of thinking, Andy Ruiz is now the lineal champ. Prove me wrong.

Sadly, I think Tyson Fury is a very talented fighter who has been shanghaied – placed under a spell by some money-grubbing dream-weaving bastard of a promoter. He’s stuck now in a rut fighting tomato cans and wee girls, waving his paws like a trained bear in a cage so the kids will throw peanuts at him.

And he roars “I’m the best! The one true champ!” And like the Emperor showing off his new clothes, he swats at Tom Schwartz and the kids shout “Yes! You’re the best!” and he swings at Otto Wallin and they all swoon “You’re our champion!”.

He doesn’t’ know that the kids work for the promoter. And none of them will tell him that he’s disengaged, disconnected from the rest of the boxing world, that he’s living a fiction, in a fantasy world.

These fights don’t mean anything. He’s not working toward a title shot, he’s saying “I’ve already got one!” like the French guard in Monty Python’s Holy Grail. Maybe he should try to fight Shrek next. It would mean as much.

He can’t see that he’s lost in a magical land* called Irrelevancy. And no one has the guts to say that really he’s just playing with himself.

The big Tosser.

*I didn’t say it was good magic.

Props to the Nightmare

They say that styles make fights, and that explains why Frazier and Ali were so bad for each other, and why Foreman was KO’d by Ali and beat Frazier like drum. It’s not a linear equation. You can’t just look at the records and the tale of the tape and predict the outcome with any authority.

As my Dad would say, “That’s why they fight.”

If it were that logical and predictable I guess we wouldn’t watch it. And I’m glad I was watching last night.

I predicted a Kownacki victory (got that part right). But I also said he would win by knockout and within five rounds.

Oops.

I’ve seen Arreola fight before – several times, including all three of his title fights. I knew what he looked like, and how he fights and I thought Kownacki would get inside of his looping punches and pummel him with uppercuts and straight shots and take him out.

Surpise number one: Arreola didn’t look like Arreola. He weighed in at 244. That’s about as trim as I can ever remember seeing him.

Surprise number two: While he normally throws about 40 punches a round – right near the heavyweight average, last night he threw twice that many – like Kownacki. Kownacki is known for his high-volume assault, relentlessly punching, punching, punching, throwing at twice the rate of the typical heavyweight. In this way, he overwhelms his opponents, chipping away at their defense till he finds his way to their chin. But instead of just covering up and hoping Kownacki would slow down, Arreola decided to fight fire with fire. He amped up his own offense, matching him punch for punch. (He actually set a record for number of punches thrown.) (!)

Surprise number three: While he did get pummeled, he never went down. They say you can’t buy a chin, or get one in the gym, so he must have worked a deal with the Devil to put that steel in his chin. It was never weak before, but last night it looked ready to take a sledge hammer. Remarkable.

Surprise number four: He wasn’t an ass. In the past I always thought of him as a bully. A cantakerous biker-looking beer-drinking bully. I’ll never forget him beating the slobber out of one Joey Abell. When it was clear that Abell was unconscious yet still standing, Arreola stopped throwing and went in for a smirking kiss instead. The Chris Arreola that we saw this week was a gentleman. For the first time I thought I could enjoy having a beer with him.

Surprise number five: The old boy ain’t done yet. I thought he was done three years ago, when he fought Wilder. He looked tired. I never saw anything like the confidence he would need to win. It even looked to me that Wilder carried him for few rounds. If I remember right, Wilder said something about giving the old man one last big payday as a send-off, a farewell. I believed it, thought that was his swan-song. When I read that he was going to fight Kownacki I bitched about it being a mis-match along the lines of Fury / Schwartz. Indeed the betting odds were severe, with Kownacki a -3,500 and Arreola +1,100. But the old guy made it a real fight, with smarts and guts and the hell with the odds.

But right the oddsmakers ultimately were, Kownacki won convincingly. After the fight that lady interviewer gushed “You said you would retire if you lost tonight, but surely after that performance you can’t be thinking of retirement now?” It was a vacuous question, but I think that she was just expressing the admiration and appreciation we all felt. He gave us a hell of a show, and we would like to see more.

But his point is well taken, and better it would be if more boxers were to adopt his point of view: He said “I’m too old to start over, and that’s where I’ll be if I lose, back to square one.” Too many, addicted to the adrenaline, can’t seem to find the brakes.

And by the way, what the hell was up with Kownacki playing the Polish national anthem? The man’s been living in Brooklyn since he was seven years old. I mean Arreola makes a big deal about his Mexican heritage, but he at least he knew what country he’s from. Props for that too.

So, I hope he does retire. And I hope he makes it stick, that he doesn’t attempt a ‘comeback’ in a couple years, saying “age is just a number” (I think George Foreman may someday regret saying that inasmuch as it has added fuel to the fire that still burns in old fighter’s bellies) and doing harm to himself. This was so much better a farewell than the Wilder fight.

Adios valiente guerrero. Via con Dios, Pesadilla.

The Rhyme and Reason of Matchmaking

In the coming weeks are two fights that I’m going to watch, and will recommend that you watch. Both fights feature an exciting up-and-comer, an undefeated knockout artist. One is Joe Joyce, the other Adam Kownacki.

Now I’ve been whining lately about the lop-sided nature of the matches that are being presented to us. I called Fury / Schwartz a farce, and it was. I thought Joshua /Ruiz was too, (it was supposed to be) but Ruiz had other ideas. I thought Wilder / Breazeale was going to at least go a few rounds, but live and learn.

Joe Joyce, who is 9-0, is fighting Bryant Jennings. Jennings is 24-3, and once went 12 rounds with Wladimir Klitschko. Okay, so what’s the problem? Joyce is ranked number 11 and Jennings 29 (IBO rankings) and a 7/2 dog.

Adam Kownacki (19-0) is to fight Chris Arreola (38-5-1), who fought Bermane Stiverne, Vitali Klitschko and Deontay Wilder for a world title, getting stopped all three times. Kownacki is ranked number 7, and Arreola 44. (They haven’t put any odds on this one yet, but you can bet (har) it will be ugly.)

Adam Kownacki needs another tune-up fight? Really?

This looks like the result of the same mentality that gave us Fury / Schwartz. But maybe not…

I got curious and I got to thinking and I looked these fellows up on Boxrec and found that in the first five fights of Joyce’s career, he fought men with a combined record of 79-27. The last four men has faced have a combined record of 108-12. So kinda what you would expect to see, the competition getting harder as Joyce gains experience.

Kownacki’s first eleven opponents have a combined record of 43-44 and the last eight 127-11. Hm. Kownacki’s team made a big change after eleven fights.

So, there is a difference in the rate of change and a difference in the starting point (Kownacki starting much lower) but the overall arc is the same. Start them out with opponents you expect them to beat, so that they can gain experience. Then gradually introduce them to better fighters and see how far you can go. The aim is prepare your man for championship level fights with out having absorbed a whole bunch of punishment on the way up.

I’m thinking maybe Joyce and Kownacki’s teams already believe they are ready for top competition.

Kownacki was actually considered to replace Jarell Miller to fight Anthony Joshua. At that time he said “I am not ready”. But shortly after Ruiz beat Joshua, he changed his tune, and there is talk that he will maybe get a shot at Wilder sometime soon.

So, maybe the thought is to just keep Kownacki healthy while he waits for his title shot.

Joyce has been saying that he wants the ‘fast track’ to the title. Maybe that explains the higher quality of fighters he was facing early in his career. I also looked up and watched his last fight (Alexander Ustinov) and I think Jennings is a step above his level. So this really could be Joyce simply climbing the ladder.

Actually I will go as far as to say that I wouldn’t be that surprised if Jennings pulled off the upset.

(I wrote this before the Joyce / Jennings fight, but forgot to post it.)

My prediction for Saturday: Kownacki wins by KO in 5 or less.

Buster

Did the internet exist in 1990? I don’t recall. I know that I didn’t have access to it, and if I did it would have been slow as hell and would have had what Dave Barry called “a duck playing a kazoo”. But I didn’t have it, so I turned on the TV.

It seemed like years since it started. Understand that I live in Columbus, and while I’ve never met the man, I did meet his father once, and John Johnson too. There had been hype aplenty, or at least more than usual, because Buster was from Columbus, was one of ours.

During his ‘comeback’ (after the loss to Tucker) there would be an article in the paper every couple weeks and invariably they would mention the tantalizing possibility that Buster would get to fight Tyson.

When he did get the fight, it was announced months in advance. And of course (you know) no one gave him a chance. I remember one local sportswriter opined that Buster did have a chance, and that because Buster was a talented fighter with a stiff jab and a huge reach advantage. I filed that information away in my mind, cherished it, pulled it out every so often to look at it and say, “I believe in you!” And I did this in private. I didn’t want to hear the raspberries of derision that showing faith in Buster would prompt.

Plus, I just didn’t like Tyson. I mean I enjoyed watching him work, who didn’t? The man was an amazing talent. But at that time I was convinced that he was evil, and was bad for boxing. I’m struggling to remember now the things that I knew about or thought I knew about him that lead me to think that way. Had he been accused of the sexual assault yet? I don’t recall. I think maybe there had been a story about him getting rough with Robin Givens. Some hard quotes, I don’t know. But in my mind he had taken heavyweight boxing to the Dark Side. I wanted to see him unseated in the worst way.

It must have been a wedding that kept me from seeing it. I don’t remember that either. So when I got home, I turned on the TV to catch the 11:00 news, to see how Buster had done.

The newscast started with the usual teasers and such, but within the first couple minutes the anchor said “We can’t show you footage from the Douglas / Tyson fight, so we sent Jim to a bar where they are showing the fight. Let’s go to Jim now and see how Buster is doing.”

And they switched to a shot of a reporter standing in front of a blank wall; you could see some people to his right, all looking to his right.

“Well Buster is doing surprisingly well. The fifth round just ended, and the commentators are saying that he has likely won all five rounds so far”

They chatted back a forth for a couple moments then went back to the studio. The news cast went on for several minutes, local news, national news, before they switched back over to Jim at the bar.

“It doesn’t look good for Buster. He was knocked down at the end of the eighth round. He was saved by the bell, but he looked pretty wobbly. He gave it good try, and did remarkably well, but it looks like Mike Tyson is now going to close the show.”

And some more banter: “Aw darn” and “too bad”.

Then after sports they went back to the bar and Jim “one last time” and: Chaos! – People shouting! Jumping! Jostling! Spraying beer! “Unbelievable! Buster Douglas has won the fight, and by a knockout!” (More jostling and spraying) “What?”

“He knocked out Mike Tyson in the tenth round, and is the new heavyweight champ!”

And that’s the way I experienced it. A week later I located a VHS tape of the fight a friend had recorded.

Of course Buster put on some weight and lost to Holyfield in three rounds in his first defense, and the raspberries of derision started anew. Of course you can blame much of that on Don “the Weasel-Heart” King. I think Buster only got out of court with him like two weeks left before the fight.

And I was briefly saddened that he lost the title so quickly. I was hoping for a long reign, to be able to brag about our local boy for a few years. But in the end it didn’t matter. His place in history is fixed. He was the undisputed champ, if only for a few months. Everybody knows it.

Klitschko said winning the belt was easy compared to hanging on to it. And he kept it for a long time. It is difficult, he said, to convince yourself to train hard year after year, for your fourth, fifth, or tenth title defense. He did 14 in a row. Dr. Steelhammer had an iron will to stay at the top.

Buster? Maybe not so much. He climbed the mountain, why climb it again? It doesn’t take away from his achievement.

So sure, when we get around to arguing who is the best of all time (you know we eventually will) I probably won’t put Buster in my top ten, but if we’re talking favorites, yeah, he’s right near the top for me.

The Coolest Man in the World

It was 1964. I was five years old. We lived in a big old dusty Queen Anne with a huge front porch, a huge front room, (I think it was actually a parlor) that I was not allowed in, and a foyer. This house had a foyer. I remember rooms, but where they were in relation to each other is mysterious to me. I could not draw an accurate floor plan. If I drew what I remember, it would be dreamlike, surreal. For instance, I have two distinct memories regarding where the TV was. One of them says it was on the second floor. I know this to be wrong, but I can see it in my mind – second story windows behind the TV.

A year prior, I was just outside the kitchen door, playing on a grassy slope with a wooden ski that my brother had found in the garage when my mother came outside to tell me that President Kennedy had been shot. So, you see, my memory still works.

But I remember coming across my brother and my father (my mind says they were in my bedroom, but I don’t believe that’s right) talking excitedly about this fellow named Cassius Clay. I didn’t know who he was, but I could see from their level of animation that he was important.

They told me that he was a boxer. I knew what boxing was, along with the skis, we had a pool table and some boxing gloves, all left behind by the last guy to live there. I remember my brother explaining to me the concept of “World Champion” and “undefeated”. I’m sure my eyes got big as I took that in, tried to grasp that this man, according to my brother (and Dad wasn’t correcting him) was the best in the whole world, and that no one had ever beaten him.

I pictured him as something like Spider-Man. Not costumed and masked, but trim and muscular, and bad as hell. I figured him to be the coolest man on the planet.

I didn’t know what he looked like until I got into the first grade and they started to take us to the school library. There I found a little book about the champ, and saw this photo:

And I saw that I was right about the Spider-Man thing. He was not a brute, but lean and strong. Sleek and lethal, like a jaguar. I thought his face looked exotic somehow, like he was an islander, or even from the Far East. I was surprised to read that he was a plain old American, from Kentucky.

I remember my first grade teacher (a man) going on a rant in class one day, talking about the “phantom punch” and how the first fight was fixed too, and he showed us a photo of Rocky Marciano unhinging Walcott’s jaw

Saying “Now that’s a real champion”. In the years to come I would hear a lot of crap like that.

By this time we were living in Cleveland, in a blue-collar neighborhood. Thoughts expressed by the community’s fathers to their families at dinner came spilling out on the playground, unfiltered and unquestioned from the mouths of their sons. You could practically smell the accompanying beer and kielbasa.

“Someone should shut him up.”

“He doesn’t fight like a man, he runs away.”

“If he doesn’t like it here, he should just go back to Africa.”

They didn’t like his name change. They didn’t like the Nation of Islam. They really didn’t like his rhyming boasts, his predictions. And when he refused to join the Army, they were apoplectic.

It got hard to be his fan. I can remember being called an n-word lover, more than once. This was supposed to be an extreme insult, an invitation to fight. But I always countered “Yes, that’s right, I am,” an admission that drew incredulity, scorn and scoffs from my classmates. But Dad didn’t raise me to be a racist.

He told me that Muhammed Ali, while not going to the same church we did, looked to be devoted and sincere in his faith, and he respected that. He also admired the courage it took for him to refuse induction, and applauded what he said about race relations.

Dad stuck with him, so I stuck with him. Seemed right. He stood up for what he believed, and he was willing to be abused for it. Seemed to me that I ought to be able to do the same.

Then he got suspended, and they held a tournament to give someone else his title, and I may have not been a racist but I was a bit of a dick, so I was mouthing off, saying Jimmy Ellis couldn’t fight, and Joe Frazier was too short, Buster Mathis was fat, and Muhammed Ali would whup them all, just as soon as he was able.

And so that animosity festered for three long years. Three years is an eternity to one still in grade school. But I never forgot him. I had faith in him.

When he finally got back in the ring, and they talked about how he had “lost a step” I silently worried that he wouldn’t be the same, that he would falter. But he won a couple fights, and signed to fight Frazier, and started in on the old Muhammed Ali trash talk and I was loving it. Right up until the fight.

When he lost, again I worried again that he was not the same. That he had aged to the point where he was no longer to occupy the hero’s place in my heart.

But he lost with grace, and even in defeat he impressed me. “I never thought of losing, but now that it’s happened, the only thing is to do it right. That’s my obligation to all the people who believe in me. We all have to take defeats in life.”

Hell, I think I took it harder than he did.

Back in those days the only way to see the fights was to go to a movie theater and pay (I don’t know, $10?) to watch on closed circuit TV. Every once in a while you could see a replay on TV at home. Mostly, I got my boxing news from the newspaper.

And I took crap the Monday after. Kids had cut out the picture from the sports page, showing Ali on his back, his feet in the air, when Frazier knocked him down in the 15th round. They showed me the picture, grinning.

Worse was when Norton broke his jaw. “He got his jaw wired shut! Just what he and his big mouth deserved!” and so on.

Don’t misunderstand – being a big kid I was not bullied in the traditional sense, but there were some kids who took delight in rubbing my nose in these humiliations.

Then along came Foreman and he blew away Frazier and he blew away Norton and by the time Don King put together the Rumble in the Jungle, I was a sophomore in High School, and in a whole ‘nuther city (Dad got moved around a lot with his job.)

He, being a good and longsuffering parent, looked and found a little pocket of houses that he could afford that were in the footprint of Firestone High School.

Firestone was populated by the rich and the very rich. Athletically, we were good at golf, tennis and diving. That’s because we had our own pool and kids whose parents belonged to a country club.

My dad’s point was this was one of the best high schools in the country in terms of academics. So he bought a little house in that neighborhood for that reason.

Firestone High School was, in 1974, I think 100% white. Even though these were the progeny of white collar men, the general animosity against Ali was present here too. The rhetoric was toned down, but some of the feelings were the same: “I find it wearying that the man still self-promotes at every opportunity.”

Some things had changed, others had not.

By mouthing off, I discovered that no one in my school was willing to bet on Ali. Not one soul. Except me.

I remember it well, because careful record keeping was not the kind of thing I often did. I spent the day before the fight writing down kids names and how much they bet (most of them in the $1 – $2 range, a couple of $5’s) in a spiral binder. I talked just like Ali – “He’s gonna knock him out – he’s too fast for Foreman, Foreman won’t even know what hit him. He’s gonna dance and wear him out. Foreman can’t keep up the pace. The man only ever fights two rounds” and so forth. And I believed my own hype, too.

Nonetheless, I was relieved (and elated!) to see the headlines the next morning. Ali not only won, he won by KO. (Though I boasted about it, I actually didn’t expect that part).

I collected $120.00. Big money for a high school kid in 1974. And talk about your bragging rights! That was a good day. My loyalty had paid off.

In the years that followed he became sort of a folk hero. It seemed like all the white people just forgot why they ever had a bug up their butt for this man in the first place. We would impersonate him, making up bad rhymes to insult each other. “Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee, your Grandma’s a monkey, swinging from a tree.”

By the time he lit the Olympic torch in ’96, the nation it seems had had enough time to process all that this man did. By that time he was a national hero, and he got the ovation he deserved. An outpouring of affection, gratitude, and apology too. For he had been sorely mistreated, and we all knew it. There was none left to argue the other side, to say “n-word lover” as if it were an insult. We all loved him then – the coolest man in the world.

Why Do Folks Hate the Draw?

Last spring I saw two fellows (Jamie Walker and Dan Karpency, super-welterweights) fight for a WBANABA belt. Walker got floored twice in the early rounds and had to reach deep. It was a back-and-forth, exciting affair that went the distance. 

It was called a draw by the judges, and some fans were really bothered by that. 

One fellow near me was shouting his opinion that Walker had won, and another fellow across the way was shouting his belief that Karpency won. For a while it sounded like these two fellows were going to find each other and have a meaningful discussion about the issue, but security prevented that.

The point is, they were not happy with the draw.

We ran into Walker on our way out, and I shook his hand and tried to give him a compliment. What I wanted to say was something like, “Tonight you embodied everything that is noble and good in boxing. That was beautiful. I hope you remember this night with pride the rest of your life.” What came out was something like, “Good work.” 

I wanted to give him that compliment because I could see in his face that he was not happy with the draw. According to his facial expression, a draw is as bad as a loss. Maybe worse.

I guess to try so hard to climb a mountain only to have the mountain disappear at the last moment is very frustrating. But far worse, in my mind, would be the split decision loss, wherein the summit is in view, but on the last step the earth falls away beneath your feet and down you go.

Seriously, what is wrong with a tie? When I was young enough to play sports, we had ties. In soccer and in football, there were ties. (Did they have ties in hockey? Probably.) Then they introduced overtime in football, and the God-awful shootout arrangement in soccer.

I’ve seen some European kickboxing bouts where an additional round is stipulated if the judges have no decision after three.

I remember an occasion where the nit-wit president of the University said, publicly, that a 13–13 tie with Michigan was “one of the greatest victories in Ohio State history.” I completely understand the rancor and ire, the shout-till-you’re hoarse rage that comment inspired. And I actually don’t hate the football solution—you know, overtime.

Overtime works well in basketball, too. And that’s what they do in baseball. Just play till you got a winner. That wouldn’t work in boxing—at least not nowadays, not with the old Marquis of Queensbury. Not even an extra round would fly. Not after Kim Duk-Koo. 

So we have the 10-Point Must System and three judges, and that allows for a limited number of outcomes, and one of them is a draw. Actually, three of them are a draw. You could have a unanimous draw, a majority draw, and a split-decision draw.

I don’t know what it would take to ever change the scoring system, and frankly the thought scares me. Just look at the mess they’ve got going on in the amateurs. It was bad (criminal) what the judges did in the Seoul Olympics, and in trying to fix it, they’ve managed to repeatedly step on their tally-whackers in increasingly sophisticated ways. 

The worst I can remember was some cockamamie arrangement where the judges had two buttons, one for each fighter. They were to hit the blue button if they saw the blue fighter land a scoring blow, and so on. If all three judges hit the blue button within one second of each other, a point would register for the blue fighter.

So, all a judge had to do to tilt the scoring the way he wanted, was to not push the button for the other guy. So, if we had Judge A who was from the same country as the blue fighter, and Judge B was from the country of the red fighter, Judge C may or may not have been the only one trying to score the fight fairly. But, it wouldn’t matter. You need all three to push the button to register a point.

So, we were treated to the spectacle of two men whacking each other for three minutes, puffy-eyed and bleeding, yet with no score. Strangely, according to the judges, no legal blows had landed.

3< (That’s me farting in their general direction.)

We don’t want that. (The bad judging or the farting.)

And we don’t want robberies like (insert the controversial pro boxing match of your choice here) either. 

I have seen some professional bouts where the judging stank to Olympic levels. Sometimes the offense is brushed aside by the broadcasters as a “confusing” decision and sometimes Teddy Atlas is there. 

Teddy has the cojones to call out the stinkers, to tell it like it is. He got fired from his gig at ESPN for doing it. 

I’ve heard him on more than one occasion saying that it’s not right; it’s an outrage to cheat fighters out of a victory considering the work that goes into training, and the risk that each fighter accepts each time they step into the ring. I agree—we owe them this. Assuring them of a fair scoring system is the least we can do.

It seems to me that there are more draws today than there were thirty years ago, maybe even ten years ago. I don’t know that for certain; I haven’t counted or pored over hundreds of fight results. It just seems like I’m seeing more of them. 

And I guess I would like to see more still. I often hear the commentators after a round saying something like this: “That was a very close round, difficult to score. But I think it may go to Jones (or Smith).” It’s almost like they don’t believe in a tie. Like the 10-Point Must System has become the 10/9-Point Must System. But there is such a thing as a 10/10 round and I think such rounds are fought far more often than they are ever scored.

Let’s call a draw a draw. We owe that to the fighters, too.

Fart Fans

Maybe it was a bet. That seems possible. Or it could be the cynical action of an embittered man like Tyler Durden taking a wiz in the clam chowder. I don’t know, but Jimmy Lennon Junior says “fart fans” every time he’s on TV. 

You’ve heard it. Right after he introduces the three judges he says, “And the third man in the ring is Jack Reiss.” (Pause) “Fart fans, here we go! 12 rounds of boxing in the welterweight division . . . .”

Maybe he and Michael Buffer got drunk one night, and one of them thought of it and it became a dare, then a bet, and here we are.

Check it out, turn it up loud, listen closely. There ain’t no doubt about it: he says, “fart fans.”

I had one friend try to say it was “Alright fans.” As if. This is a man that makes millions (he does) by speaking clearly. That’s basically all he does, and he clearly says “fart fans.”

Or maybe he’s just irked that Buffer makes more money than he does. Maybe he’s jealous of his good looks and rock star status. Maybe like the frustrated 20 year old that draws dicks on poop stall walls, he does it because it momentarily makes him feel a little better. 

Maybe there’s a thrill wondering if this is the time someone will catch on.

If that’s what it is, it’s a pretty good scam. I mean, it’s impolite, sure, but it’s just little-kid naughty. If he was working in an adult cuss word, that would surely attract a lot more attention. But “fart fans” is kind of innocuous. People don’t hear it. I mean, they hear it, but they don’t give it a second thought, supposing that to call attention to it would make them look childish. 

Good thing I’m here not giving a crap.

You have to admire Michael Buffer though. At 74, he still looks good, he’s got a hot wife, and he’s worth millions.

And that looks to me to be one sweet gig. 

I imagine he shows up early, gets a handle on how to pronounce the fighter’s names (BTW he totally booted Ruiz’s name when announcing the particulars after the fight: he said, “Andy Ruse, Junior”), the judges names, the referee’s names, etc. No one wants to hear him stumble over a name, as much as he charges.

He has to get his hair and makeup done and so forth. He wears a tux, so that probably takes a little while to put on. 

Still, all in all, that sounds like a pretty light workload. 

He made up the “Let’s get ready to rumble” thing. That was his from the start. I remember back in the eighties it made the news that he was trying to get the phrase trademarked, and we all thought that was ridiculous. We made jokes about it. 

He got his trademark in 1992. Various sources around the internet say he has earned in excess of $400 million from that move, though he says the real number is “a lot less.” Even so, my man got it going on.

Then there’s David “for the love of God, someone get the hedge clippers” Diamante. (Shudders.) I can’t even pretend to know what that’s about.

You Say “Boring,” I Say You Weren’t Watching

Sportswriters and broadcasters are fond of saying that the heavyweight division is exciting again, has been revitalized, reborn, is on fire.

Implied in this discussion (and sometimes a plainly spoken opinion) is that Wladimir Klitschko was boring, and thank God he finally retired.

Boring?

I never thought so.

Over the decades the public has had very different reactions to intelligent, thoughtful fighters with a strong defense. Gentleman Jim Corbett was revered for his “scientific” style of jabbing and then dancing out of his opponent’s reach. Later, Jack Johnson was reviled for much the same technique. Ali did it to mixed reviews. Some thought he was the most talented ever; some said that he was not a “real” champion, because he didn’t “really” fight (meaning stand toe to toe).

In our times, Floyd Mayweather is hailed as a genius, while Klitschko is panned as dull.

From 2007–2011, Mayweather fought just one fight a year. Klitschko had nine fights in that span. Mayweather had zero knockouts the last five years of his career (ignoring the farce that was the McGregor fight). Klitschko had five knockouts the last five years of his career. Who’s boring?

Have you seen the left hook that leveled Kubrat Pulev? How about Ray Austin? It’s not a myth—Klitschko KO’d him in round 2 without ever having thrown his right hand. Could have had one hand tied behind his back. How about Calvin Brock? Derrick Jefferson? Chris Byrd?

Just stop there. Go look up those five fights on Youtube (no worry, I did the work for you above), then compare them to five fights by Floyd Mayweather. No disrespect to Mayweather, but I do not see how anyone could complain of Klitschko’s being boring while simultaneously admiring Mayweather. 

These were spectacular performances. Boring? Please.

“Well yeah, Klitschko had a lot of knockouts, but his style was boring.” Yeah, and predictable. He just kept winning; I hate that.

Tyson Fury leveled this charge at him during the build-up to their fight, then he beat Klitschko by devising and executing the most boring fight plan ever. 

My dad always said you gotta beat the title out of the champ. Fighting to stay upright, or fighting to a draw, or even an arguably close point win wouldn’t cut it. You either have to knock the champ out, or win the most rounds, and win them big, obviously and convincingly. They don’t give those belts away; you gotta beat it out of them.

Fury proved that wrong. He won by running away. I mean full credit for figuring out a winning strategy; no one else could do it. And by the rules of boxing, I guess he hit Wladimir more than Wladimir hit him . . . so, yeah. I guess. I think a different ref might have given them both warnings in the early going for not fighting, and maybe DQ-ing both of them after five or six rounds.

 “He was only “great” because he had no competition. The heavyweight division had a ten-year dearth of real talent.”

You sure? Povetkin and Pulev are numbers six and seven in the IBO rankings today. Klitschko beat both of those guys. I don’t think Samuel Peter was a marshmallow either. Or Tony Thompson, for that matter.

He beat 12 undefeated fighters in his career. That’s more than anybody else ever did. He successfully defended his titles 23 times. Could it be that he was just better than the rest?

As for boring, I know you all saw the Joshua fight. Boring? You think he woke up one day as a 41 year old and decided “I’m going to completely change my fighting style for this world title fight”? Please.

He had some boring fights, sure. His win against Ibragimov was a dull affair, as was his win over Povetkin, not to mention the aforementioned Fury bout. But have you watched Mike Tyson vs. James “Bonecrusher” Smith? Zzzz . . . zzzz . . . zzzz . . . .

Bigfoot Martin went ten rounds with George Foreman (*Yawn*).

Muhammed Ali had a number of lackluster bouts. Nobody ever said he was boring.

No, I reckon people didn’t like Klitschko because he did not fit the stereotypical heavyweight champion mold. First, he was white—the first white man to hold the title since Ingmar Johansen took it from Floyd Patterson in 1959. After Johansen there is an unbroken string of sixteen black American heavyweight champs from Patterson (who took it back from Johansen) till Lennox Lewis (who is British) broke it. 

Then along comes this foreigner, a white foreigner. A college-educated white foreigner who speaks four languages. A good-looking college-educated white foreigner who speaks four languages. And he was kicking ass.

And the search began for a great black hope just as they looked for a great white hope to take out Jack Johnson a century before. Calvin Brock, Ray Austin, Tony Thompson, Hasim Rahman, Eddie Chambers, Samuel Peter, David Haye, Jean-Mark Mormeck, and Bryant Jennings were all marched out and presented as “this is the one that will give Klitschko trouble; this is the one to take his crown.” And Klitschko beat them all. Seven of those nine by KO.

And he was never apologetic about it. He never said, “Sorry, I know I don’t belong here.” He looked like he felt right at home, and was having the time of his life.

I imagine some folks threw up their hands when it was another foreign white guy that finally took his titles. 

And Wilder came this close to beating Fury. I am stoked for that rematch.

But I guess no one has said that Fury is boring. Annoying maybe, but not boring.